mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-01-12 01:20:14 +00:00
d90eeb8ecd
There are no scenarios where a weak increment is invalid on binder_node. The only possible case where it could be invalid is if the kernel delivers BR_DECREFS to the process that owns the node, and then increments the weak refcount again, effectively "reviving" a dead node. However, that is not possible: when the BR_DECREFS command is delivered, the kernel removes and frees the binder_node. The fact that you were able to call binder_inc_node_nilocked() implies that the node is not yet destroyed, which implies that BR_DECREFS has not been delivered to userspace, so incrementing the weak refcount is valid. Note that it's currently possible to trigger this condition if the owner calls BINDER_THREAD_EXIT while node->has_weak_ref is true. This causes BC_INCREFS on binder_ref instances to fail when they should not. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 457b9a6f09f0 ("Staging: android: add binder driver") Reported-by: Yu-Ting Tseng <yutingtseng@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251015-binder-weak-inc-v1-1-7914b092c371@google.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>